Estudios clínicos y genéticos en tres miembros de una familia afectados con adenomas hipofisarios aislados con prolactinomas homogéneos / Clinical and genetic studies of a three-member familial isolated pituitary adenoma with homogeneous prolactinomas

La mayoría de los adenomas hipofisarios son esporádicos, pero un 3-5% puede ocurrir en un contexto familiar y hereditario. Este es el caso de la neoplasia endocrina múltiple de tipo 1 (NEM1), complejo de Carney (CNC) y adenomas hipofisarios aislados familiares (FIPA). El FIPA es una condición infrecuente, que ocurre en un contexto familiar, no asociada a NEM t ipo1 ni CNC. Los FIPA pueden ser homogéneos (todos los adenomas tienen el mismo fenotipo) o heterogéneos (diferente fenotipo tumoral). Describimos una familia congolesa en la que dos hermanas y una prima fueron diagnosticadas a los 29, 32 y 40 años, respectivamente, con un prolactinoma (FIPA homogéneo). Las pacientes presentaron macroadenomas no invasivos al momento del diagnóstico, con buena respuesta biológica y tumoral al tratamiento con cabergolina hasta una dosis máxima de 1.5 mg/semanal. De las dos hermanas, una cursó un embarazo sin complicaciones. Durante el seguimiento de 12 años, ninguna de ellas presentó elementos clínicos o biológicos compatibles con NEM1 o CNC, por lo que dichos genes no se estudiaron. El análisis genético en dos de las pacientes permitió descartar la posibilidad de una mutación germinal del gen aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP). Se considera que el 80% de los pacientes con FIPA no presentan mutación del gen AIP, por lo que se requieren futuros estudios en este tipo de familias, para poder determinar otros genes afectados involucrados en su fisiopatología.

Most pituitary adenomas are sporadic, but 3-5% can occur in a family and hereditary context. This is the case of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), Carney complex (CNC) and familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA). FIPA is an infrequent condition that occurs in a family context, not associated with MEN type1 or CNC. FIPA kindred can be homogeneous (all adenomas affected in the family having the same tumor phenotype) or heterogeneous (different tumor phenotypes in the affected members). We describe a Congolese family in which two sisters and a cousin were diagnosed with a prolactinoma (homogenous FIPA) at the ages of 29, 32 and 40 years, respectively. The patients presented with macroadenomas at the time of diagnosis, non-invasive tumors and good biological response to cabergoline treatment (maximum dose of 1.5 mg/weekly). Of these two sisters, one went through a pregnancy without complications. Because no MEN1 and CNC clinical and biochemical features were detected during the 12-year follow-up, these genes were not investigated. The genetic analysis of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) was normal. As nearly 80% of patients with FIPA do not have a mutation in the AIP gene, future studies in these families are required to identify other affected genes involved in their physiopathology.

Phenotype and resistance patterns of 10 resistant prolactinomas.

BACKGROUND: Dopamine agonists (DA) are the first-line therapy in prolactinomas, but they fail to decrease prolactin (PRL) levels and/or tumor size in some of these tumors, which are labeled as resistant prolactinomas (RP). To date, risk factors for DA resistance are not fully understood and management of DA-RP is not well established. METHODS: We retrospectively recorded clinical, biochemical and radiological features, as well as management and outcome, of all cabergoline (CAB)-RP attended at the Endocrinology department of a tertiary hospital between 1995 and 2016. CAB resistance was defined as the failure to normalize PRL (biochemical resistance, BR) or reduce tumor size by at least 50% (morphological resistance, MR) with a CAB dose up to 2mg/week (or 3mg/week in cases where lower doses were not tested) for at least 3 months. RESULTS: Ten CAB-RP were found. The mean age of the cohort was 30.6 years and 50% of subjects were male. The average tumor size was 1.78cm (80% macroadenomas). The mean maximal dose of CAB was 3.8mg/week. Five patients showed isolated MR, four combined MR+BR and only one isolated BR. MR patients were more often males and older than MR+BR patients. Transsphenoidal surgery achieved normalization of PRL and/or disappearance of tumor in three of seven patients. At the end of follow up all patients had controlled PRL levels (with or without CAB) and most of them bore a visible although stable tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated MR and combined MR+BR are the most frequent patterns of DA resistance whereas isolated BR seems to be uncommon. Our data support a high tumor size but not male gender as a risk factor for DA resistance.

Adenoma hipofisario ectópico del seno esfenoidal persistente tras cirugía manejado con tratamiento conservador / Ectopic pituitary adenoma in the sphenoid sinus persistent after surgery managed with conservative treatment

Los adenomas hipofisarios ectópicos (EPA) constituyen un reto diagnóstico, dada su escasa prevalencia y variada presentación en la que puede incluirse un síndrome de hipersecreción de hormonas hipofisarias. La clínica suele ser larvada e inespecífica, no presentan ninguna característica radiológica diferencial y el diagnóstico habitualmente es anatomopatológico. Sin embargo, a pesar de ser tumores benignos, pueden presentar un comportamiento agresivo, con invasión ósea y difícil resección completa, por lo que un diagnóstico de sospecha precoz podría resultar en un tratamiento más eficaz y con un menor número de complicaciones. Presentamos el caso de una paciente con un adenoma hipofisario ectópico silente en el seno esfenoidal con inmunohistoquímica positiva para Hormona de crecimiento (GH) y prolactina que presentaba restos tumorales tras la intervención quirúrgica y ha sido manejada con tratamiento médico conservado, con buenos resultados.

Ectopic pituitary adenomas constitute a diagnostic challenge, given their low prevalence and varied presentation in which a pituitary hormone hypersecretion syndrome may be included. Clinical symptoms are usually latent and nonspecific, they have no differential radiological characteristics and the diagnosis is usually anatomopathological. However, despite being benign tumors, they can exhibit aggressive behavior, with bone invasion and difficult complete resection, so a diagnosis of early suspicion could result in more effective treatment and fewer complications. We present the case of a patient with a silent ectopic pituitary adenoma in the sphenoid sinus with positive immunohistochemistry for Growth Hormone (GH) and prolactin who had tumor remnants after surgery and was managed with conservative medical treatment, with good results.

Presentación atípica de un prolactinoma gigante en un adolescente de 15 años / Atypical presentation of a giant prolactinoma in a 15-year-old boy

El prolactinoma gigante es un adenoma pituitario poco frecuente caracterizado por su gran invasión local. Se reporta el caso de un varón de 15 años de edad con dolor retroocular izquierdo y exoftalmos ipsilateral de 4 meses de evolución secundario a un tumor en la base del cráneo que invadía la órbita. Los estudios hormonales revelaron prolactina sérica de 6913,7 ng/ml (valor normal < 20), que confirmó el diagnóstico de prolactinoma gigante. El paciente inició un tratamiento con el agonista dopaminérgico cabergolina en dosis crecientes. Luego de 7 meses de seguimiento, la prolactina había descendido a 349,8 ng/ml y el volumen del tumor se redujo un 70%, sin efectos adversos al tratamiento. El paciente se encontraba asintomático y había reiniciado la pubertad. La rápida remisión de los síntomas sin necesidad de tratamientos invasores subraya la importancia de considerar el diagnóstico de prolactinoma entre los posibles diagnósticos diferenciales de tumor de la base del cráneo.

Giant prolactinomas are rare pituitary adenomas characterized by their great local invasion. In this paper, we report a 15-year-old male with left retro-ocular pain and ipsilateral exophthalmos of 4 months of evolution, secondary to a tumour in the base of the skull that invaded the orbit. Hormonal studies revealed serum prolactin of 6913,7 ng/ml (normal value < 20), confirming the diagnosis of giant prolactinoma. The patient started treatment with the dopaminergic agonist cabergoline in increasing doses. After 7 months of follow-up the prolactin had decreased to 349.8 ng/ml and the tumor volume was reduced by 70%, without presenting adverse effects to the treatment. The patient was asymptomatic and had restarted puberty. The rapid remission of symptoms without the need for invasive treatments underlines the importance of considering the diagnosis of prolactinoma among the possible differential diagnoses of tumor of the skull base.

Use of lanreotide in combination with cabergoline or pegvisomant in patients with acromegaly in the clinical practice: The ACROCOMB study.

PURPOSE: To describe real-world use of lanreotide combination therapy for acromegaly. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ACROCOMB is a retrospective observational Spanish study of patients with active acromegaly treated with lanreotide combination therapy between 2006 and 2011. 108 patients treated at 44 Spanish Endocrinology Departments were analyzed separately: 61 patients received lanreotide/cabergoline (cabergoline cohort) and 47 lanreotide/pegvisomant (pegvisomant cohort). RESULTS: Patient median age was 50.8 years in the cabergoline cohort and 42.7 years in the pegvisomant cohort. Prior medical treatments were somatostatin analogue (SSA) monotherapy (40 [66%] patients) or dopamine agonists (7 [11%] patients) in the cabergoline cohort and SSA (29 [62%] patients) or pegvisomant monotherapy (16 [34%] patients) in the pegvisomant cohort. Across both cohorts 12 patients were previously untreated, and prior therapy was unknown/missing in 4 patients. Median duration of combined treatment was 1.6 years (0.1-6) and 2.1 years (0.4-6.3) in the cabergoline and pegvisomant cohorts, respectively. At baseline, median insulin growth factor (IGF)-I values were 149% upper limit of normal (ULN) (15-505%) in the cabergoline cohort and 156% ULN (15-534%) in the pegvisomant cohort, and decreased to 104% ULN (13-557%) p<0.001 and 86% ULN (23-345%) p<0.0001, respectively, at end of study (EOS). Normal age-adjusted values of IGF-I were obtained in 48% of lanreotide/cabergoline-treated patients and 70% of lanreotide/pegvisomant-treated patients at EOS. There were no significant changes in hepatic, cardiac or glycaemic parameters in either cohort. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice lanreotide treatment combinations are useful options for patients with acromegaly when monotherapy is insufficient; particularly, the combination of lanreotide and pegvisomant in patients not controlled with either SSA or pegvisomant alone has high efficacy and is well-tolerated.

Estudo de biodisponibilidade relativa entre duas formulações de cabergolina em voluntários sadios / Comparative bioavailability study between two cabergoline formulations in healthy volunteers

Este estudo foi realizado para comparar a biodisponibilidade de duas formulações de cabergolina 0,5 mg comprimidos (Cabertrix® - Cabergolina da Zodiac Produtos Farmacêuticos S/A, formulação teste e Dostinex® do Laboratórios Pfizer Ltda., formulação referência) em 42 voluntários de ambos os sexos (21 voluntários do sexo feminino e 21 voluntários do sexo masculino) em condição de jejum. O estudo foi aberto, aleatorizado, 2-sequências, 2-períodos, cruzado, nos quais um grupo de voluntários recebeu a formulação teste e outro a formulação referência. As amostras de plasma foram obtidas ao longo de um intervalo de 72 horas após a administração da medicação. As concentrações de cabergolina foram determinadas através de Espectrometria de Massa (HPLC-MS-MS), utilizando cabergolina-d5 como padrão interno. A partir dos dados obtidos, calcularam-se os seguintes parâmetros farmacocinéticos: ASC0-t e Cmax. A razão da média geométrica de Cabertrix®/Dostinex® 0,5 mg foi de 97,48 % para ASC0-72 e 94,45 % para Cmax. Os intervalos de confiança de 90% foram de 92,07%-103,21% e 86,53%-103,10%, respectivamente. Uma vez que os intervalos de confiança de 90% para Cmax e ASC0-t estiveram dentro da faixa de 80%-125%, conclui-se que o comprimido de Cabertrix® de 0,5 mg foi bioequivalente ao comprimido de Dostinex® de 0,5 mg...

Avaliação do risco de valvulopatias cardíacas por cabergolina no tratamento de prolactinomas / Risk assessment of cardiac valve disorders by cabergoline to treat prolactinomas

Introdução: Os prolactinomas são os adenomas hipofisários mais comuns, representando 60% dos casos. Tratam-se de tumores geralmente benignos da hipófise, secretores de prolactina (PRL), que ocorrem sobretudo em mulheres com menos de 50 anos. O tratamento medicamentoso dos prolactinomas com agonistas dopaminéricos (AD) é muito eficaz e bem tolerado, levando à redução dos níveis séricos de PRL e até mesmo diminuição do tamanho do tumor, até mesmo com o seu desaparecimento em alguns casos. Atualmente, os AD utilizados para o tratamento de prolactinomas são representados pela bromocriptina (BC) e pela cabergolina (CAB), sendo este último o mais utilizado devido à maior tolerância e eficácia. O uso desta classe de medicação na doença do Parkinson ocasionou lesões valvulares cardíacas fibróticas. Objetivos: Avaliar o risco de lesão em válvulas cardíacas nos pacientes com prolactinomas e que fizeram o tratamento com CAB.Métodos: Estudo tipo caso-controle com análise comparativa de 20 casos do ambulatório e neuroendocrinologia da clínica de endocrinologia HSPM-SP e 20 controles do ambulatório de ecocardiograma do HSPM-SP, sendo avaliados os ecocardiogramas de ambos os grupos e analisados a morfologia e funcionalidade das válvulas cardíacas. Resultados: Em relação aos 20 ecocardiogramas dos casos, 6 estavam alterados, apresentando refluxos mitral e/ou tricúspide leves. Dos 20 ecocardiogramas dos controles, 12 apresentaram alterações, desde 1 com calcificação mitral e os demais com refluxo mitral e/ou tricúspides leves. Conclusão: Nosso trabalho não mostrou aumento da incidência de valvulopatia cardíaca em pacientes com prolactinomas tratados sob regimes habituais de CAB quando comparado com controles. Devemos usar a menor dose eficaz de cabergolina e solicitar ecocardiogramas se tratamentos longos e/ou com doses elevadas para farmacovigilância, como proposto pela agência européia de medicações

Estudio retrospectivo sobre las posibles complicaciones maternofetales de la exposición a cabergolina / Retrospective Study of any potencial Adverse Effects of Cabergoline on Pregnancy and Embryofetal Development

Objetivos: Estimar la frecuencia de complicaciones maternofetales en mujeres que se embarazaron durante el tratamiento con cabergolina (CAB). Estimar la frecuencia de patología detectada posnacimiento en los niños producto de dichos embarazos. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo y multicéntrico de 86 embarazos en 78 mujeres con hiperprolactinemia idiopática (7) o tumoral (44 micro y 27 macro), en tratamiento con CAB en el momento de la concepción. Edad: 20 a 45 años; PRL inicial: 30 a 1429 ng/ml; duración del tratamiento previo al embarazo 1 a 120 meses; dosis: 0.125 a 4 mg/semana. El rango de exposición embriofetal a la CAB fue de 3 a 27 semanas, el 96.39% de las pacientes la recibió durante el primer trimestre y el 3.61% hasta el segundo. Resultados: No hubo complicaciones mayores durante el embarazo. Se registraron 7 abortos espontáneos (8.1%) y 75 partos, de los cuales 49 fueron vaginales y 26 cesáreas. Se registraron 69 recién nacidos, 63 fueron a término y 6 pretérmino (8.8%), ninguno bajo peso para la edad gestacional. En 3 (5.2%) recién nacidos se observó: 1 malformación mayor (Síndrome de Down) y 2 menores (hernia umbilical e inguinal). Se obtuvo seguimiento de 42 recién nacidos; se diagnosticó epilepsia refractaria en uno y un trastorno generalizado del desarrollo en otro. No se halló una mayor frecuencia de complicaciones en los embarazos ni en los recién nacidos expuestos a CAB que en la población normal. Sería necesario mayor número de pacientes para concluir sobre la seguridad de CAB durante el embarazo.

Objectives: To assess the rate of any potential adverse effects on pregnancy and embryo-fetal development in women who became pregnant under treatment with cabergoline (CAB). To follow up medical data of children who were born from mothers exposed to Cab in early weeks of gestation. Material and methods: Observational, retrospective and multicenter study on 86 pregnancies in 78 women with idiopathic or tumoral hyperprolactinemia. All patients were under Cab at conception. The average age was 29 (range: 20-45). Pituitary images at diagnosis showed 44 microadenomas, 27 macroadenomas and 7 were normal. Serum PRL at baseline was between 30 and 1429 ng/ml. Duration of therapy before pregnancy ranged from 1 to 120 months. Maternal and fetal exposure to cabergoline and doses ranged from 0.125 to 4 mg/week. The mean serum PRL level under which patients achieved pregnancy was 17 ng/ml. Fetal exposure ranged from 3 to 27 weeks; 96.39% of patients received CAB during the first trimester of pregnancy and 3.61% until the second one. Results: No significant complications during pregnancy were found. Seven women (8.1%) had spontaneous abortions. Term deliveries were recorded in 63/69, preterm in six (8.8%), none of them with low weight for gestational age. Neonatal abnormalities were observed in 3 (5.2%): 1 major (Down syndrome) and 2 minor malformations (umbilical and inguinal hernia). Two out of 42, developed abnormalities during the follow- up, one of them was a refractory epilepsy during the second month of life, the other presented a Pervasive Developmental Disorder diagnosed in the third year of life. Conclusion: No significantly higher frequency of complications was found in pregnancies and/or offspring exposed to CAB than in normal population. Larger series of patients are needed to asses the safety.

Utilidad de la cabergolina en pacientes portadores de prolactinoma resistentes o intolerantes a bromocriptina / Usefulness of cabergoline in patients with prolactinemia and resistant or intolerant to bromocriptine

Introducción: La terapia de elección de los prolactinomas son los agonistas dopaminérgicos, cuyo principal exponente es la bromocriptina, sin embargo, hay pacientes que no responden o presentan severos efectos secundarios (resistentes o intolerantes a bromocriptina, respectivamente). El objetivo en este estudio fue valorar la respuesta al uso de cabergolina en pacientes con prolactinomas, intolerantes o resistentes a bromocriptina Material y métodos: Se estudiaron 27 pacientes (25 mujeres y dos varones) en quienes se realizó determinación basal de prolactina y cada mes hasta completar tres meses, registrando los datos asociados a hiperprolactinemia y los efectos secundarios. La dosis inicial fue de 0.25 mg los lunes y jueves durante la primera semana, y 0.5 mg a partir de la segunda. El análisis estadístico incluyó la prueba de Shapiro-Wilk, Kruskal-Wallis y Anova. Resultados: 22 pacientes presentaron microadenomas y cinco macroadenomas. En los intolerantes (n = 11) el valor inicial de prolactina de 61.45 ± 19.82 disminuyó al tercer mes a 4.94 ± 1.79 (p < 0.024). En los resistentes (n = 16), el valor basal fue 119.53 ± 11.52; 15 pacientes redujeron significativamente a 12.95 ± 3.66 (p < 0.005) al tercer mes de tratamiento. En ambos, los signos atribuibles a la hiperprolactinemia mejoraron significativamente, con poca incidencia de efectos secundarios. Conclusiones: La cabergolina es útil en la mayoría de los pacientes considerados intolerantes o resistentes a la bromocriptina.

BACKGROUND: Dopaminergic agonists are the treatment of choice for prolactinomas with bromocriptine (BCE) being the primary agent used. There is a group of patients who are not responders to such therapy or have severe side effects (resistant or intolerant to BCE, respectively). We undertook this study to evaluate the response to the administration of cabergoline (CBG) in patients intolerant or resistant to BCE. METHODS: Twenty seven patients (25 females and 2 males) were recruited with prolactin-pituitary tumors, obtaining basal serum prolactin (PRL) samples and again each month up to 3 months. We recorded signs associated with hyperprolactinemia and secondary effects of CBG. The initial dose was 0.25 mg twice weekly during the first week, with an increase to 0.5 mg twice weekly from the second week until the conclusion of the study. Statistical analysis included Shapiro-Wilk, Kruskal-Wallis and ANOVA tests. RESULTS: Twenty two patients had microadenomas and five had macroadenomas. In the intolerant group (n= 11), the initial PRL value (61.45 +/- 19.82) decreased by the third month to 4.94 +/- 1.79 (p<0.024). In the resistant group (n= 16), basal PRL values were 119.53 +/- 11.52. In 15 of these patients, the PRL value significantly decreased to 12.95 +/- 3.66 ng/ml (p<0.005) by the third month of treatment. In both groups the signs related to hyperprolactinemia significantly improved, with a low incidence of secondary effects due to CBG. CONCLUSIONS: CBG is useful in most patients considered as intolerant or resistant to BCE.

McCune-albright syndrome and acromegaly: hormonal control with use of cabergoline and long-acting somatostatin - case report / Síndrome de McCune-albright associada à acromegalia: controle hormonal com cabergolina e somatostatina de longa duração - relato de caso

OBJECTIVES: The use of drug therapy based on cabergoline, octreotide and long-acting release (LAR) octreotide has presented varying results in the treatment of GH excessive production in patients with McCune-Albright Syndrome. METHODS: We report the case of a 29 year-old female patient presenting McCune-Albright Syndrome and complaint of excessive bone growth. RESULTS: The patient presented a pituitary adenoma involving the right internal carotid artery and excessive secretion of growth hormone (no GH suppression was observed after the oral glucose tolerance test). Due to the presence of diffuse thickness in skull base bones, surgical approach was not considered effective and the patient was submitted to drug therapy with octreotide LAR and cabergoline. At the one year follow-up, GH and IGF-1 levels were normal and no adverse effects were present. CONCLUSION: The use of drug therapy based on the association of cabergoline and octreotide is safe and able to achieve complete hormonal control in the treatment of acromegaly for McCune-Albright patients.

OBJETIVO: O uso de terapia medicamentosa, como cabergolina, octreotide e octreotide de longa duração, tem apresentado resultados variados no tratamento da produção excessiva de hormônio de crescimento (GH) em pacientes com síndrome de McCune-Albright. MÉTODOS: Foi relatado o caso de uma paciente de 29 anos apresentando síndrome de McCune-Albright com queixas de crescimento ósseo excessivo. RESULTADOS: A paciente apresentava adenoma pituitário com envolvimento da artéria carótida interna direita e produção excessiva de GH (sem supressão de GH após o teste de supressão com glicose). Por causa do aumento importante da espessura dos ossos da base do crânio, a abordagem cirúrgica foi considerada pouco efetiva e a paciente foi submetida à terapia medicamentosa com octreotide de longa duração e cabergolina. No seguimento de um ano, os níveis de GH e IGF-1 estavam normais e os efeitos adversos não eram presentes. CONCLUSÃO: A terapia medicamentosa fundamentada na associação de cabergolina e octreotide é segura e capaz de alcançar controle hormonal completo no tratamento de acromegalia na síndrome de McCune-Albright.

Agonistas dopaminérgicos para prolactinomas: quando, quanto e por quanto tempo? / Dopamine agonists for prolactinomas: when, how much and how long?

Os prolactinomas são os tumores hipofisários mais comuns e têm como tratamento de escolha os agonistas dopaminérgicos, que propiciam normalização dos níveis de prolactina, redução tumoral e reversão da galactorreia e das manifestações do hipogonadismo na maioria dos casos. A cabergolina é preferível a bromocriptina por ser mais eficaz e mais bem tolerada. Todo macroprolactinoma, a princípio, deve ser tratado, e a terapia dos microprolactinomas pode ser reservada para casos de amenorreia, galactorreia incômoda, distúrbios sexuais ou infertilidade. Ainda existem controvérsias sobre a dose máxima desses medicamentos e sobre a duração ideal do tratamento. Sugerem os autores sua suspensão depois de 24 meses, caso tenha havido normalização dos níveis de prolactina, particularmente quando a ressonância magnética hipofisária não revele anormalidade.

Prolactinomas are the most common hipophisary tumors. Their treatment of choice are dopamine agonists that provide in most cases normalization of prolactin levels, tumor reduction and reversal of both galactorrhea and hypogonadism symptoms. Cabergoline is preferable to bromocriptine because it is more effective and better tolerated. While all macroprolactinomas, a priori, should be treated, the therapy of microprolactinomas can be reserved for cases of amenorrhea, bothersome galactorrhea, sexual disturbances or infertility. There is still controversy about the maximum dose of dopamine agonists and the ideal duration of treatment. The authors suggest treatment withdrawal after 24 months if there has been normalization of prolactin levels, particularly in patients with normal pituitary magnetic resonance findings.